6 found
Order:
  1.  65
    Waddington’s Legacy to Developmental and Theoretical Biology.Jonathan B. L. Bard - 2008 - Biological Theory 3 (3):188-197.
    Conrad Hal Waddington was a British developmental biologist who mainly worked in Cambridge and Edinburgh, but spent the late 1930s with Morgan in California learning about Drosophila. He was the first person to realize that development depended on the then unknown activities of genes, and he needed an appropriate model organism. His major experimental contributions were to show how mutation analysis could be used to investigate developmental mechanisms in Drosophila, and to explore how developmental mutation could drive evolution, his other (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2.  43
    C.H. Waddington’s differences with the creators of the modern evolutionary synthesis: a tale of two genes.Jonathan B. L. Bard - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (3):18.
    In 2011, Peterson suggested that the main reason why C.H. Waddington was essentially ignored by the framers of the modern evolutionary synthesis in the 1950s was because they were Cartesian reductionists and mathematical population geneticists while he was a Whiteheadian organicist and experimental geneticist who worked with Drosophila. This paper suggests a further reason that can only be seen now. The former defined genes and their alleles by their selectable phenotypes, essentially the Mendelian view, while Waddington defined a gene through (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  28
    Growth and death in the developing mammalian kidney: signals, receptors and conversations.Jonathan B. L. Bard - 2002 - Bioessays 24 (1):72-82.
    Because the kidney (metanephros) starts to function before completing development, its patterning and morphogenesis need to be closely integrated with its growth. This is achieved by blast cells at the kidney periphery generating new nephrons that link up to the extending collecting‐duct arborisation, while earlier‐formed and more internal nephrons are maturing and beginning to filter serum. This pattern of development requires that cell division and apoptosis be co‐ordinated in the various kidney compartments (collecting‐ducts, blast cells, metanephric mesenchyme, nephrons and vascular (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  17
    Traction and the formation of mesenchymal condensations in vivo.Jonathan B. L. Bard - 1990 - Bioessays 12 (8):389-395.
    Although the segregation of mesenchyme into distinct aggregates is the first step in the development of a range of tissues that includes bones, somites, feathers and nephrons, we still know very little about the mechanisms by which this happens. There are two obvious types of explanation: first, that there are global pre‐patterns within the mesenchyme whose molecular expression leads to tissue fragmentation and, second, that the condensations arise spontaneously through the local morphogenetic abilities of the cells. The only known mechanism (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  30
    Do universities do too much research?Jonathan B. L. Bard - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (1):1-2.
  6.  15
    The mouse Embryologist's Bible. Atlas of mouse development. By Matthew Kaufman. Academic Press, London. £72. 512pp. ISBN 0‐12‐402035‐6. [REVIEW]Jonathan B. L. Bard - 1992 - Bioessays 14 (12):873-873.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark